Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients

By A. Coulter, J. Ellins. British medical journal, 2007

1,085 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0901c0afdff27a235f88d4927525b85c89904378

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2011, neutral): “health literacy and self-management [71], and consumer”
SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients (2013, background): “Several groups have also developed tools and processes for patients and family members to identify patient safety events and participate in quality improvement efforts (Coulter & Ellins, 2007; Giles, Lawton, Din, & McEachan, 2013; Unruh & Pratt, 2007; Weingart et al., 2005; Weingart et al., 2011).”
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement (2016, background): “19 22 23 The involvement process has also been seen as an important way in healthcare systems of enhancing democratic principles and accountability.”
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2023, background): “…with patients and advocacy groups, physicians, AI researchers, and AI developers can gain a deeper understanding of the unique challenges and concerns faced by various patient populations and promote the development of more equitable and effective AI solu‑ tions tailored to individual needs [119].”
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review (2018, background): “Traditionally, and most commonly, this engagement has focused on the relationship between patients and providers in making care decisions or how to improve patient efforts to manage their own care [7].”