PIC: practical Internet coordinates for distance estimation
By Manuel Costa, Miguel Oom Temudo de Castro, Antony Ian Taylor Rowstron, Peter B. Key. 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2004. Proceedings., 2004
354 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08f96121e635985769441340fce72c68629713e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Ben Y. Zhao
- Frank Dabek
- Robert Morris
- Jonathan Ledlie
- Margo I. Seltzer
- Haitao Zheng
- Konstantina (Dina) Papagiannaki
- Frans Kaashoek
Citations in the corpus
- Network Coordinates in the Wild (2007, methodology): “PIC [7] does not use explicit landmarks, incorporating measurements to any node using a simplex optimization algorithm to obtain an up-to-date coordinate.”
- Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? (2005, background): “[5][19][20]) and studied the potential benefits of locality in P2P filesharing systems such as KaZaa and Gnutella [8][24].”
- Vivaldi: a decentralized network coordinate system (2004, methodology): “This result agrees with the results presented in Section 5 6.2 Decentralized Internet coordinate systems PIC [3], like Vivaldi, can use any node that knows its coordinates as a landmark for future nodes: PIC does not require explicitly designated landmarks.”
- On the Embeddability of Random Walk Distances (2013, methodology): “used to approximate delays between machines on a network, in the form of network coordinate systems [31, 28, 10, 27].”