Diversity and occurrence of coprophilous fungi

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quantification of population sizes of large herbivores and their long‐term functional role in ecosystems using dung fungal spores (2016, background): “This result is congruent with bird dung being reported to be a substrate less suitable for fungal growth (Richardson 2001; Doveri 2007).”
Herbivore dung as food for dung beetles: elementary coprology for entomologists (2016, background): “The taxonomic and functional diversity of fungi (e.g. Dix & Webster, 1995; Richardson, 2001; Masunga et al., 2006; Sarocco et al., 2015) and bacteria (e.g. Sinton et al., 2007; Ley et al., © 2016 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 41, 367–377 2008; Girija et al., 2013) in…”
A test of Sporormiella representation as a predictor of megaherbivore presence and abundance (2009, background): “species including hare, rabbit, grouse, and deer (Richardson, 2001; Váňová and Kubátová, 2005).”
Fungi in Ecosystem Processes (2016, background): “In a literature review, Richardson (2001) showed that there were highly significant differences in the fungal community structure among the dung of six animal species.”
Linking abundances of the dung fungus Sporormiella to the density of bison: implications for assessing grazing by megaherbivores in palaeorecords (2013, background): “New spores are passively dispersed to the surrounding vegetation, where they may be consumed by herbivores to continue the fungus’ life cycle (Richardson 2001; Nyberg & Persson 2002).”