Time-series Generative Adversarial Networks
By Jinsung Yoon, Daniel Jarrett, Mihaela van der Schaar. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019
1,481 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08d350a25720d865a52c00f3af6cb80e7af52d58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Zhengwei Wang
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Ling Yang
- Tomás Ward
- Eoin Brophy
- Runsheng Xu
- Zhilong Zhang
- Qingyun She
Citations in the corpus
- Generative Adversarial Networks in Time Series: A Systematic Literature Review (2022, methodology): “In terms of qualitatively evaluating time series based GANs, it normally conducts t-SNE [95] and PCA [13] analyses to visualize how well the generated distributions resemble the original distributions [107].”
- Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications (2022, methodology): “GANs mainly consist of two models: a generator 𝐺 and a discriminator 𝐷 .”
- Autoregressive Denoising Diffusion Models for Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting (2021, methodology): “In the multivariate setting we also have point forecasting meth-ods (Lai et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019) as well as probabilistic methods, like this method, which explicitly model the data distribution using Gaussian copulas (Salinas et al., 2019a), GANs (Yoon et al., 2019), or normalizing flows (de B”
- UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systems Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systems (2018, unknown): “For GAN-like models, (Yoon et al., 2019) combine adversarial training and a supervised learning objective for time series forecasting.”
- Data Augmentation techniques in time series domain: a survey and taxonomy (2022, methodology): “Regarding the previous models, this architecture is able to outperform previous models such as TimeGAN providing better synthetic data for DA.”