Why Mexico's regional income convergence broke down
By Daniel Chiquiar. 2005
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/086fe72a57a5cd50e16142bc43df5d8a1b57c543
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Panel data stochastic convergence analysis of the Mexican regions (2009, unknown): “Previous studies of the Mexican case – see, for instance, Chiquiar (2005), and Carrion-i-Silvestre and German-Soto (2007) – have revealed the existence of structural breaks that have affected the individual GDP in different ways – among the numerous events we can think of are the economic crises…”
- The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey (2011, unknown): “…have higher/faster growing GDP per capita spatial divergence spatial divergence due to concentration of export activities in the Manila area Chiquiar (2005) Mexico 31 regions; 1970- 2001 GLS regressions of sigma and beta convergence regional GDP per capita no explicit measure difference…”
- Intra- and Inter-industry Externalities from Foreign Direct Investment in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector: New Evidence from Mexican Regions (2008, background): “However, the introduction of trade liberalization appears to have caused a structural break in this process, as findings for the late 1980s and 1990s clearly identify a process of regional divergence (Aroca & Maloney, 2005; Chiquiar, 2005; RodriguezPose & Sanchez-Reaza, 2002).”