A Common Origin for Aftershocks, Foreshocks, and Multiplets

By K. Felzer, R. Abercrombie, G. Ekström. 2002

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/086afa76446f110771bb0c9ab1db63e846365fe5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

Citations in the corpus

Estimation of Space–Time Branching Process Models in Seismology Using an EM–Type Algorithm (2006, background): “The model parameter â = 1.034, for instance, is commonly thought to be closer to log(10) ≈ 2.3 (Felzer, Abercrombie, and Ekström 2004; Helmstetter, Kagan, and Jackson 2005, 2006).”
Connecting near-field and far-field earthquake triggering to dynamic strain (2010, methodology): “Similar arguments for the importance of small earthquakes have been made previously based on statistical considerations [Felzer et al., 2004; Felzer and Brodsky, 2006; Helmstetter et al., 2005; Sornette and Werner, 2005a, 2005b].”
Seismicity rate immediately before and after main shock rupture from high-frequency waveforms in Japan (2007, unknown): “[3] Among the three parameters in the modified Omori’s law, the K value describes aftershock productivity, which scales with main shock magnitude m [Felzer et al., 2004; Helmstetter et al., 2005], and depends on the cutoff magnitude of the events considered as aftershocks.”
Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering (2004, background): “It thus validates our hypothesis that the size of a triggered earthquake is not determined by the size of the trigger, but that any small earthquake can grow into a much larger one [Kagan, 1991b; Helmstetter, 2003; Felzer et al., 2004].”
Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)—The Time‐Independent Model (2014, methodology): “The complete bookkeeping details are given in Appendix O (Powers and Field, 2013). In UCERF2, the models for each fault were constructed separately, and background seismicity was then added. The UCERF3 procedure solves for the rates of all events simultaneously using the inversion method of Field an”