A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese

By Michael Haugh, Carl G. Hinze. 2003

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/085ab58903273fc8f1689abc2c14099c0ec15f68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Michael Haugh

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Michael Haugh

In Language and Linguistics

1. Michael Haugh

Citations in the corpus

• The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation (2007, unknown): “In terms of the metalanguage first proposed in Haugh (2002) and Haugh and Hinze (2003), then, by implying something (“A says U and because of this B thinks something else (I) in addition to U that A did not say”) the speaker shows what he/she thinks of the hearer or him/herself (“what A thinks of…”
• Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research (2012, background): “…acknowledgment of the way in which Chinese folk notions have contributed to academic theorization of face and politeness (Bargiela-Chiappini 2003; Haugh and Hinze 2003; Haugh 2005; Terkourafi 2007), there have until recent years only been a limited number of attempts to better understand the…”