Venue and outcome in ecological experiments : manipulations of larval anurans

By David Skelly, Joseph Kiesecker. 2001

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/084d39c2e392ef7098774f70e804a37d850f9d13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. E. Werner
2. George W. Kling
3. A. Hendry
4. K. Berven
5. Stefano Larsen
6. R. Altwegg
7. P. Govindarajulu
8. L. Schiesari

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Altwegg
2. E. Werner
3. Franz Hölker
4. A. Hendry
5. K. Berven
6. Stefano Larsen
7. P. Govindarajulu
8. L. Schiesari

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Werner
2. George W. Kling
3. R. Altwegg
4. Franz Hölker
5. A. Hendry
6. K. Berven
7. L. Schiesari
8. D. Hocking

Citations in the corpus

• Amphibian Contributions to Ecosystem Services (2014, background): “The results of small-scale studies do not always predict the effects at larger scales (Skelly and Kiesecker 2001; Skelly 2002).”
• Invasive Plant and Experimental Venue Affect Tadpole Performance (2006, unknown): “Investigations of invasive plant impacts need to carefully consider appropriate venues (Oksanen 2001; Petersen and Hastings 2001; Skelly and Kiesecker 2001; Skelly 2002).”
• A critique for eco‐evolutionary dynamics (2019, background): “Overall, however, me‐ socosm experiments tend to generate results that are quite different from those observed in nature (Skelly & Kiesecker, 2001; Stewart et al., 2013; Wolkovich et al., 2012).”
• Carnivory and resource‐based niche differentiation in anuran larvae: implications for food web and experimental ecology (2009, background): “For example, a meta-analysis of over 50 studies and a subsequent empirical test indicated that the effects of interspecific competition were much stronger in mesocosms than in field enclosures, even when tadpole densities and spatial scale were held constant (Skelly & Kiesecker, 2001; Skelly, 2002).”
• Artificial Light at Night Affects Organism Flux across Ecosystem Boundaries and Drives Community Structure in the Recipient Ecosystem (2017, background): “…9 October 2017 | Volume 5 | Article 61 with complex questions at the ecosystem scale, as effort and cost associated with such large-scale experiments limits the use of replicated units (Carpenter, 1990, 1996; Skelly and Kiesecker, 2001; Davies and Gray, 2015; Barley and Meeuwig, 2017).”
• Density Dependence in the Terrestrial Stage of Wood Frogs: Evidence from a 21-Year Population Study (2009, background): “A large body of research performed in a variety of venues, including lab, field, and mesocosm studies (summarized in Skelly and Kiesecker, 2001) has demonstrated strong effects of larval density on larval growth rates, development times, and survival.”
• MATRIX MODEL INVESTIGATION OF INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL: BULLFROGS ON VANCOUVER ISLAND (2005, background): “Both development and survival estimates were obtained from density manipulations conducted in artificial ponds, which may overestimate the strength of density dependence in natural ponds (Skelly and Kiesecker 2001).”