ASSESSING AND EXPLAINING MISPERCEPTIONS OF PEER DELINQUENCY

By Jacob T. N. Young, J. C. Barnes, Ryan C. Meldrum, Frank M. Weerman. 2011

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/083cd8c0071a5a01baf50821f61d25e49ed23366

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. J. Turanovic
2. Travis C. Pratt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Turanovic
2. Travis C. Pratt
3. Kristy Holtfreter
4. Alex R. Piquero
5. Michael D. Reisig
6. Kevin M. Beaver
7. Jacinta M. Gau
8. Cortney A. Franklin

Citations in the corpus

• “Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop”: Self-Control, Risky Lifestyles, and Repeat Victimization (2012, background): “Research has demonstrated that respondents’ perceptions of peer delinquency may be biased to a certain extent by hearsay or by the likelihood of individuals to project their own tendencies onto their friends (Haynie and Osgood 2005; Weerman and Smeenk 2005; Young et al. 2011).”
• Public Perceptions of the Justifiability of Police Shootings: The Role of Body Cameras in a Pre- and Post-Ferguson Experiment (2016, methodology): “Third, the reduced Grasmick Self-Control scale (SCS; Grasmick, Tittle, Bursik, Jr., & Arneklev, 1993), as used by Young, Barnes, Meldrum, and Weerman (2011), was included because of an extensive literature base that shows self-control impacts people’s perceptions of cognitive thought process…”