Military expenditure, threats, and growth

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH (2009, methodology): “The negative impact of military burden on growth is coherent both with the theoretical view and with recent empirical estimations (Stroup and Heckelman, 2001; Cuaresma and Reitschuler, 2003; Aizenman and Glick, 2006).”
Military expenditure and economic growth: A meta-analysis (2012, methodology): “A number of recent empirical studies appears to support this; Landau (1993), Stroup and Heckelman (2001), Aizenman and Glick (2006) and Kalaitzidakis and Tzouvelekas (2007). Stroup and Heckelman (2001) consider a non-linear relationship between milexp and growth. They extend the Barro-type growth mo”
ARMS TRADE, MILITARY SPENDING, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH (2007, methodology): “Aizenman and Glick (2003) hypothesize that military expenditure induced by external threats should increase output by increasing security, while military expenditure induced by rent seeking and corruption should reduce growth by displacing productive activities.”
MODELS OF MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND GROWTH: A CRITICAL REVIEW (2005, methodology): “The fifth section reviews the Barro (1990) model, which is also popular in the growth literature and is applied to military expenditure by Aizenman and Glick (2003).”