Sweetening WORDNET with DOLCE

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches (2005, unknown): “Examples are the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) [55] and Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE) [31].”
Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches (2004, background): “Sweetening wordnet with DOLCE.”
Relations in biomedical ontologies (2005, background): “They have a central role in almost all domain ontologies, including the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) [19,20], GO and other ontologies in OBO, as well as in influential top-level ontologies such as DOLCE [21] and in digitalized lexical resources such as WordNet [22].”
Ontology Matching (2007, methodology): “Examples are the upper Cyc ontology (Lenat and Guha 1990), the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) (Niles and Pease 2001), the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) (Guizzardi 2005), and Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE) (Gangemi et al. 2003).”
Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods (2016, background): “In that sense, mere ontologies without any instances (such as DOLCE [27]) would not be considered as knowledge graphs.”