Trophic Levels and Functional Feeding Groups of Macroinvertebrates in Neotropical Streams
By S. Tomanova, E. Goitia, J. Helešic. Hydrobiologia, 2006
350 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/082b8ef94de566ad6b9119bfb7fe96b8d257e45e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring the effects of salinization on trophic diversity in freshwater ecosystems: a quantitative review (2018, neutral): “…Rogers (2011), Ramı́rez & GutiérrezFonseca (2014) Shredder Cuts, chews plant material Materials from higher plants Invertebrate Merritt et al. (1996, 2008), Tomanova et al. (2006), Boyero et al. (2011), Ramı́rez & Gutiérrez-Fonseca (2014) Omnivore Generalist, consumes a variety of food materials…”
- Longitudinal and altitudinal changes of macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in neotropical streams : a test of the River Continuum Concept (2007, methodology): “Data on macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups (FFG) were gathered mainly from Tomanova et al. (2006) who studied Bolivian taxa, and occasionally completed with information from Poi de Neiff (1990), Merritt & Cummins (1996), Bello & Cabrera (2001), Graça et al. (2001), Miserendino & Pizzolón…”
- Chironomids as indicators in freshwater ecosystems: an assessment of the literature (2015, background): “Among these organisms, aquatic insects are the most important, because they are the major proportion of functional feeding groups helping in ecosystem dynamics; but nonetheless they still are the most threatened (Tomanova et al., 2006; Strayer, 2013).”