Estimates of plant density of wheat crops at emergence from very low altitude UAV imagery.

By Xiuliang Jin, Shouyang Liu, Frédéric Baret, Matthieu Hemerlé, Alexis Comar. 2017

382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Plant density is useful variable that determines the fate of the wheat crop. The most commonly used method for plant density quantification is based on visual counting from ground level. The objective of this study is to develop and evaluate a method for estimating wheat plant density at the emergence stage based on high resolution imagery taken from UAV at very low altitude with application to high throughput phenotyping in field conditions. A Sony ILCE α5100L RGB camera with 24 Mpixels and equipped with a 60 mm focal length lens was flying aboard an hexacopter at 3 to 7 m altitude at about 1 m/s speed. This allows getting ground resolution between 0.20 mm to 0.45 mm, while providing 59–77% overlap between images. The camera was looking with 45° zenith angle in a compass direction perpendicular to the row direction to maximize the cross section viewed of the plants and minimize the effect of the wind created by the rotors. Agisoft photoscan software was then used to derive the position of the cameras for each image. Images were then projected on the ground surface to finally extract subsamples used to estimate the plant density. The extracted images were first classified to separate the green pixels from the background and the rows were then identified and extracted. Finally, image object (group of connected green pixels) was identified on each row and the number of plants they contain was estimated using a Support Vector Machine whose training was optimized using a Particle Swarm Optimization. Three experiments were conducted in Greoux, Avignon and Clermont sites with some variability in the sowing dates, densities, genotypes, flight altitude, and growth stage at the time of the image acquisition. The application of the method on the 270 samples available over the three sites provides a RMSE and relative RMSE on estimates of 34.05 plants/m 2 and 14.31% with a bias of 9.01 plants/m 2 . However, differences in performances were observed between the three sites, mostly related to the growth stage at the time of the flight. Plants should have between one to two leaves when images are taken. Further, a specific sensitivity analysis shows that the ground resolution of the images should be better than 0.40 mm. Finally, the repeatability of the method is good especially when images are taken from similar observational geometries. The current limits and possible improvements of the method proposed are finally discussed.

Subfields: Ecology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0825d6b23cc993c2d9741b9e02af3eeb6b35c083

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Zhenhai Li
  2. Tao Yang
  3. Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada
  4. Bo Ming
  5. Rajeev K. Varshney
  6. Chenwei Nie
  7. Urs Schmidhalter
  8. Shaokun Li

In Plant Science

  1. Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada
  2. Rajeev K. Varshney
  3. Chenwei Nie
  4. Urs Schmidhalter
  5. Matthew P Reynolds
  6. Zhenhai Li
  7. Yonggui Xiao
  8. Malcolm J. Hawkesford

Citations in the corpus