Legitimation and Accumulation in Climate Change Governance

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Accumulation by Conservation (2014, background): “Increasing concerns about anthropogenic climate change are channelled into carbon markets that claim to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions through offsets (Paterson 2010, Lohmann 2011).”
National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “Common explanations for this variation are in terms of 14 the novelty of emissions trading (although emissions trading has been in practice implemented 15 much more widely than carbon taxation), the legitimacy problems faced by emissions trading 16 (Paterson, 2010), or political contestation over in”
The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework (2019, background): “One example is the efforts of NGOs to delegitimize global climate governance by claiming that its solutions are too market-oriented (Paterson 2010).”
Challenges to the development of carbon markets in China (2016, unknown): “For example, some transnational oil giants and the financial sector have formed advocacy groups and significantly influenced governments’ decisions to introduce ETSs in Europe and the US (Meckling, 2011; Newell & Paterson, 2010).”