Remittances: Transaction Costs, Determinants, and Informal Flows

By Caroline Freund, Nicola Spatafora. 2005

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recorded workers' remittances to developing countries have grown rapidly, to more than $100 billion in 2004, bringing increasing attention to these flows as a potential tool for development. But even these statistics are likely to significantly understate true remittances, as a large share is believed to flow through informal channels. Estimates of the importance of the informal sector vary widely, ranging from 35 percent to 250 percent of recorded flows. The primary motivation of the study is to develop the first empirical methodology to estimate informal flows. We use insights from the literature on shadow economies and empirically estimate informal remittances for more than 100 countries, using historical data on workers' remittances from the Balance of Payments (BOP), as well as data on migration, transaction costs, and various country characteristics. Our results imply that informal remittances amount to about 35-75 percent of official remittances to developing countries. There is significant regional variation: informal remittances to Sub-Saharan Africa and Eastern Europe and Central Asia are relatively high, while those to East Asia and the Pacific are relatively low. These estimates are supplemented with detailed household survey data on remittance receipts in a number of countries. Our results also shed light on the determinants of recorded remittances and the associated fees in the formal sector. We find that the stock of migrants in OECD countries is the primary determinant of remittances. In addition, money transfer fees and the presence of dual exchange rates reduce the share of remittances reported in national accounts. In turn, transaction costs are systematically related to concentration in the banking sector, lack of financial depth, and exchange rate volatility. There is also evidence that remittances are misrecorded in the BOP as "Errors and Omissions".

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07d4107f394a1ad95c31f080e0c74efff8b5c685

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Banque Africaine de Développement
  2. G. Fayad
  3. F. Carmignani
  4. J. Hagen‐Zanker
  5. Catherine A. Pattillo
  6. Programme des Nations Unies pour le Développement
  7. S. Gupta
  8. Jeffrey A. Frankel

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Banque Africaine de Développement
  2. G. Fayad
  3. F. Carmignani
  4. J. Hagen‐Zanker
  5. Smita Wagh
  6. Catherine A. Pattillo
  7. Programme des Nations Unies pour le Développement
  8. S. Gupta

Citations in the corpus