Effect of bubble column dimensions on flow regime transition

By M. Ruzicka, J. Drahos, M. Fialová, N. H. Thomas. 2001

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07c54f20c922ffa78b0108222b7db24fdb1f8948

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. T. Ziegenhein
2. Fabio Inzoli
3. Giorgio Besagni

In Water Science and Technology

1. T. Ziegenhein
2. Fabio Inzoli
3. Giorgio Besagni

Citations in the corpus

• Comprehensive experimental investigation of counter-current bubble column hydrodynamics: Holdup, flow regime transition, bubble size distributions and local flow properties (2016, background): “Ruzicka et al. (2001) calculated Utrans in three bubble columns (dc¼0.14, 0.29, and 0.4 m) and found that an increase in dc reduced transition velocity.”
• Two-Phase Bubble Columns: A Comprehensive Review (2018, background): “15 m is large enough for the results to be scalable [1,24,98,140], as supported by different investigators [8,31,141].”