Intra- and inter-sexual aggression by bonobos in the context of mating

By G. Hohmann, B. Fruth. 2003

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07c420708552cd91789306038d80b1e6cd119115

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Brian Hare
2. T. Furuichi
3. Victoria Wobber
4. Nahoko Tokuyama
5. R. Wrangham
6. E. Vogel
7. G. Hohmann
8. T. Deschner

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. E. Vogel
2. Nahoko Tokuyama
3. T. Furuichi
4. Brian Hare
5. R. Wrangham

In Social Psychology

1. R. Wrangham
2. Victoria Wobber
3. Brian Hare
4. T. Furuichi
5. Nahoko Tokuyama
6. E. Vogel
7. G. Hohmann
8. T. Deschner

Citations in the corpus

• Mate competition, testosterone and intersexual relationships in bonobos, Pan paniscus (2012, background): “…that males may adopt alternative strategies such as establishing close associations with unrelated females that are characterized by reduced aggression and elevated mating activity and that these relationships might be important in the context of mating (Hohmann et al. 1999; Hohmann & Fruth 2003a).”
• Rank differences in energy intake rates in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus: the effects of contest competition (2005, background): “... Busse 1982; Bulger and Hamilton 1987; savannah baboons: Altmann and Alberts 2003b; meerkats: Russell et al. 2003), spatial positioning in the group (wedge-capped capuchin monkeys and Robinson 1981; long-tailed macaques: van Noordwijk and van Schaik 1987; brown capuchin monkeys: Janson 1990; oliv”
• Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba (2016, background): “However, coalitions of female bonobos have been considered to be useful for preventing male harassment (Furuichi, 2011; Hohmann & Fruth, 2003; Kano, 1992; Parish, 1994, 1996; White & Wood, 2007), and our results support this view.”
• The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression (2012, background): “…at relatively low intensity; unlike chimpanzees, bonobos do not express dominance through formal signals and have very low-intensity displays relative to those of chimpanzees (Kano 1992; Parish 1996; Furuichi 1997; Vervaecke et al. 1999, 2000a, b; Hohmann & Fruth 2003a, b; Paoli et al. 2006).”