Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm
By Wolf Vanpaemel, M. Vermorgen, Leen Deriemaecker, Gert Storms. 2015
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
To study the availability of psychological research data, we requested data from 394 papers, published in all issues of four APA journals in 2012. We found that 38% of the researchers sent their data immediately or after reminders. These findings are in line with estimates of the willingness to share data in psychology from the recent or remote past. Although the recent crisis of confidence that shook psychology has highlighted the importance of open research practices, and technical developments have greatly facilitated data sharing, our findings make clear that psychology is nowhere close to being an open science.
Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07ba44a6a53d5b116b9de3067f5060b5cd8b4771
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions (2018, unknown): “Nevertheless, in many disciplines -- including psychology--data sharing is still relatively rare (e.g., Wolins, 1962; Ceci, 1988; Wicherts, Borsboom & Molenaar, 2006; Reidpath & Allotey, 2001; Savage & Vickers, 2009; Vanpaemel, Vermorgen, Deriemaecker & Storms, 2015).”
- Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science (2017, background): “Several studies have shown that open data is a rare practice among researchers (Freese, 2007; Reidpath & Allotey, 2001; Vanpaemel et al., 2015; Wicherts, Boorsboom, Kats, & Molenaar, 2006).”