Comparing Density Forecasts Using Threshold- and Quantile-Weighted Scoring Rules
By Tilmann Gneiting, Roopesh Ranjan. 2011
515 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07b14f69099d1fdab8f09ff4e4155f379a5fcd8d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Andrew J. Patton
- Thomas Kneib
- Cees G. H. Diks
- N. Klein
- Tilmann Gneiting
- Stefan Lang
- Dick Van Dijk
- Valentyn Panchenko
In Finance
- Andrew J. Patton
- Tilmann Gneiting
- Cees G. H. Diks
- Keven Bluteau
- Dick Van Dijk
- Thomas Kneib
- Petra Friederichs
- J. Ziegel
In Global and Planetary Change
- Sebastian Lerch
- Thordis Linda Thorarinsdottir
- Petra Friederichs
- W. Ehm
- Martin Leutbecher
- Thomas Kneib
- Fabian Krüger
- J. Ziegel
Citations in the corpus
- Bayesian structured additive distributional regression with an application to regional income inequality in Germany (2015, methodology): “the whole integral) but also to perform a quantile decomposition and to plot the mean quantile scores versus α in order to compare fits of specific quantiles (Gneiting and Ranjan, 2011).”
- Generalised Density Forecast Combinations (2015, unknown): “As discussed by Diks et al. (2011), the weighted logarithmic scoring rule, w t ( y t +1 ) log q it ( y t +1 ), used in (36) is not proper (see also Gneiting & Ranjan (2011)); i.e., there can exist incorrect density forecasts that would receive a higher average score than the actual (true)…”
- Copula Methods for Forecasting Multivariate Time Series (2013, background): “H0 : E h log c1 Ût; ̂1t log c2 Ût; ̂2t i = 0 (75) vs H1 : E h log c1 Ût; ̂1t log c2 Ût; ̂2t i > 0”
- Forecasting risk with Markov-switching GARCH models:A large-scale performance study (2018, methodology): “…significance of the differences in the forecasting performances of two competing models, say models i and 12 We follow the implementation of Gneiting and Ranjan (2011) and compute wCRPS with the following approximation: wCRPSt ≈ zu − zl M − 1 M∑ m=1 w(zm)(F (zm |It−1) − I{yt ≤ zm})2, where…”
- Nonlife Ratemaking and Risk Management with Bayesian Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (2013, background): “In such a case, it can be helpful to follow Gneiting and Ranjan (2011) who suggest a quantile decomposition of the quantile score given by −2 ∫ 1”
- Ensemble size: How suboptimal is less than infinity? (2018, methodology): “Lerch et al. (2017) recommend using proper scores that emphasize the events of interest, such as the threshold-weighted CRPS (twCRPS: Gneiting and Ranjan, 2011).”
- Using Entropic Tilting to Combine BVAR Forecasts With External Nowcasts (2014, unknown): “Studies such as Gneiting and Raftery (2007) and Gneiting and Ranjan (2011) discuss the advantages of the CRPS over other measures.”
- COHERENCE AND ELICITABILITY (2013, methodology): “Gneiting and Ranjan (2011) propose a method to compare density forecasts with emphasis on different regions of interest, such as the center or the tails of the distributions.”
- Comparing Possibly Misspecified Forecasts (2020, background): “A “scoring rule” (see, e.g., Gneiting and Ranjan 2011), is a loss function mapping the density or distribution forecast and the realization to a measure of gain/loss.”
- Conditional transformation models (2012, methodology): “The quantile score representation of the continuous ranked probability score (see Gneiting and Ranjan 2011) might be a basis to develop a boosting technique similar to the one described in this paper for the estimation of full conditional quantile functions.”
- Real-Time Inflation Forecasting in a Changing World (2009, unknown): “Gneiting and Ranjan (2011) showed that it is invalid to use weighted log scores to emphasize certain areas of the distribution (such as the tails) in density forecast evaluation.”
- Bayesian Structured Additive Distributional Regression (2013, background): “In many applications, e.g. insurances [Klein et al., 2013a, Heller et al., 2006] or weather forecasts [Gneiting and Ranjan, 2011], distributions with point masses at zero are of great interest.”
- Spatiotemporal wildfire modeling through point processes with moderate and extreme marks (2021, methodology): “We also considered the threshold-weighted CRPS (twCRPS) (Gneiting & Ranjan 2011), with weight given by the indicator 1y≥100ha, in order to disregard prediction performance below 100 ha.”
- Probabilistic Forecasting with Spline Quantile Function RNNs (2019, methodology): “This can easily be incorporated by using a quantile-weighted version of CRPS, as proposed by Gneiting and Ranjan (2011).”