Plant architecture and epiphytic macroinvertebrate communities: the role of an exotic dissected macrophyte

By K. Cheruvelil, P. Soranno, J. Madsen, Marla J. Roberson. Journal of The North American Benthological Society, 2002

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07a0015bb690904d7edbbda64dbd0798acb776d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. David L. Strayer
2. Heather M. Malcom
3. Alysa Remsburg
4. Monica G. Turner
5. M. Vinarski
6. Daniel Simberloff
7. Alan P. Covich
8. Daniel L. Graf

In Environmental Chemistry

1. David L. Strayer
2. Monica G. Turner
3. Heather M. Malcom

In Insect Science

1. David L. Strayer
2. Monica G. Turner

Citations in the corpus

• Invertebrate communities associated with a native (Vallisneria americana) and an alien (Trapa natans) macrophyte in a large river (2003, background): “plants that are particularly edible or have highly dissected foliage may support unusually dense populations of invertebrates (Cheruvelil et al., 2002).”
• Aquatic invertebrate responses to fish presence and vegetation complexity in Western Boreal wetlands, with implications for Waterbird productivity (2006, background): “The trophic interactions that shape aquatic invertebrate communities can vary with habitat complexity (Cheruvelil et al. 2002) and fish presence (Diehl 1992, Bouffard and Hanson 1997) and can alter wetland food webs (Batzer and Wissinger 1996, Abjornsson et al. 2002, Zrum and Hann 2002, Hall et al.…”
• Aquatic and terrestrial drivers of dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages within and among north-temperate lakes (2009, background): “…describe habitat suitability for predacious species on land (e.g., Pianka 1967, Brose 2003, De Souza and Martins 2005, Muntifer-ing et al. 2006) and in the water (e.g., Werner et al. 1983, Carr 1991, Tupper and Boutilier 1995, Cheruvelil et al. 2002, Sass 2004, Milner and Gloyne-Phillips 2005).”
• Effects of macrophyte heterogeneity and food availability on structural parameters of the macroinvertebrate community in a Pampean stream (2011, background): “It has been suggested that plants with complex shapes may provide a higher surface area than simple plants, and, therefore, may support greater macroinvertebrate biomass and density (Cyr & Downing, 1988; Cheruvelil et al., 2002) and may offer the best protection for prey species (Heck & Crowder, 199”