Learning against multiple opponents
By Thuc D. Vu, Rob Powers, Yoav Shoham. 2006
21 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Kevin Leyton-Brown
- Ana Lúcia Cetertich Bazzan
- Erik Zawadzki
- Asher Lipson
- Frank Hutter
- Holger H. Hoos
- Aaron Klein
- Katharina Eggensperger
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Kevin Leyton-Brown
- Ana Lúcia Cetertich Bazzan
- Erik Zawadzki
- Asher Lipson
- Frank Hutter
- Holger H. Hoos
- Jakob N. Foerster
- Katharina Eggensperger
Citations in the corpus
- Empirically Evaluating Multiagent Learning Algorithms (2014, methodology): “is setting instead of n-player repeated games or either2- orn-player stochastic games for two reasons. First, the case of two-player repeated games has received the most past study (though see e.g., (Vu et al., 2005)). Second, considerably more work has been done to identify experimentally-interesti”
- Opportunities for multiagent systems and multiagent reinforcement learning in traffic control (2009, background): “Although other criteria are being proposed (see [86]), it certainly makes little sense to evaluate a learning or adaptation algorithm by such criteria when the environment is itself dynamic, as it is the case of the traffic scenario discussed here.”