Nonhomotheticity and Bilateral Trade: Evidence and a Quantitative Explanation
By Ana Cecília Fieler. 2011
382 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07860642a0daa2b3c4ce2e2c047b214b38277025
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Arnaud Costinot
- A. Rodríguez-Clare
- N. Ramondo
- Sebastián Sotelo
- David J. Donaldson
- James R. Markusen
- Thibault Fally
- Samuel Kortum
Citations in the corpus
- Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade (2017, background): “But if one is interested 48 Away from the CES case, Fieler (2011) also documents heterogeneous effects of China’s growth across countries.”
- Monopolistic Competition when Income Matters (2017, positive): “…conditions, richer countries trade relatively more between themselves than poorer countries, which is in line with the evidence (for instance see Fieler, 2011).31 We believe that the assumption of indirect additiv- 30Augmenting the model with strategic interactions would generate a competition…”
- The Impact of Regional and Sectoral Productivity Changes on the U.S. Economy (2014, neutral): “Then, using the definition of Pn and equations (19) and (23), we have that ln Û = ∑J j=1 α ( ln Ân + ln ( $n ŵn x̂n + (1−$n) χ̂ x̂n )) , (31) where $n = (1−βnιn)wn (1−βnιn)wn+(1−βn)χ .”
- A Global View of Productivity Growth in China (2016, neutral): “1 Fieler (2011) provides a similar exercise in an Eaton and Kortum (2002) model with non-homothetic preferences.”
- Estimating the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models (2017, neutral): “Using this insight, Waugh (2010) illustrates that asymmetric trade costs are one way to rationalize differences in trade flows between rich and poor countries (another way is to recur to non-homotheticity; see Fieler 2011).”
- Robots, Tasks and Trade (2018, neutral): “…for welfare and income distribution, including influential contributions by Yi (2003), Dekle, Eaton, and Kortum (2008), Chor (2010), Waugh (2010), Fieler (2011), Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodriguez-Clare (2012), Ramondo and Rodriguez-Clare (2013), Caliendo and Parro (2015), Donaldson (2018) and…”
- Engel's Law in the Global Economy: Demand‐Induced Patterns of Structural Change, Innovation, and Trade (2019, positive): “12For example, by using the Constant Ratio of Income Elasticity (CRIE) preferences, which are directly explicitly additive, both Fieler (2011, eq.(9)) and Caron, Fally, and Markusen (2014, eq.(20)) derive the Engel’s curve, which can be rewritten in our notation as: log( ⁄ ) = .− ( ) − ( ) log( ) + ”