Conditioning mean steady state flow on hydraulic head and conductivity through geostatistical inversion

65 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions (2003, background): “The same can be done with a stochastic model based on moment equations in a manner similar to that of Hernandez et al. (2003).”
Inverse methods in hydrogeology: Evolution and recent trends (2014, methodology): “…concept of the SCM could be implemented in the original PiPM, and it has326 been applied multiple times since then (e.g., Alcolea et al., 2006, 2008; Lavenue and De Marsily, 2001).327 Gómez-Hernández et al. (2003) reviewed stochastic conditional inverse modeling showing the strengths328 of SCM.”
Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff (2003, methodology): “[14] Hoeting et al. [1999] point out that (1) the number of potentially feasible models may be exceedingly large, rendering their exhaustive inclusion in M infeasible and (2) the specification of prior model probabilities p(Mk) remains challenging, having received little attention in the statistical”