Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: An experimental dissection ☆
By Michael H. Birnbaum. 2004
104 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0767edad96396d8027fb84fae59ad1b5dad58569
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Ulrich Schmidt
- Román Gutiérrez
- Michael H. Birnbaum
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Ralph Hertwig
- James C. Cox
- Vjollca Sadiraj
- E. Brandstätter
In General Decision Sciences
- Román Gutiérrez
- Ulrich Schmidt
- Ralph Hertwig
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Michael H. Birnbaum
- E. Brandstätter
- Vjollca Sadiraj
- James C. Cox
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Ralph Hertwig
- Román Gutiérrez
- Ulrich Schmidt
- E. Brandstätter
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- James C. Cox
- Vjollca Sadiraj
- Michael H. Birnbaum
Citations in the corpus
- A Comparison of Five Models that Predict Violations of First-Order Stochastic Dominance in Risky Decision Making (2005, methodology): “Prior TAX implies violations of coalescing and therefore violations of stochastic dominance in special choices (Birnbaum, 1997, 2004a).”
- Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk (2014, methodology): “There exist, however, also several studies observing the majority of violations in the opposite direction (termed fanning in): see Conlisk (1989), Prelec (1990), Camerer (1992), Wu and Gonzalez (1998), Birnbaum (2004), Birnbaum and Schmidt (2010), and Schmidt and Trautman (2010). DCRE and DCCE play ”
- Tests of rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory in gambles represented by natural frequencies: Effects of format, event framing, and branch splitting (2004, background): “Violations of this property observed by Wu and by Birnbaum can be interpreted as violations of coalescing, as can the classic ‘‘common consequence’’ paradoxes of Allais and variants on those paradoxes (Birnbaum, 2004).”
- Tests of Branch Splitting and Branch-Splitting Independence in Allais Paradoxes with Positive and Mixed Consequences. (2007, methodology): “By dissecting coalescing and branch independence, we can test among alternative descriptive models (Birnbaum, 1999a, 2004a).”
- The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs (2006, methodology): “For illustration, consider the following two problems reported by Birnbaum (2004) :”
- An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty (2008, methodology): “An approach that is neutral with respect to the issue of transitivity has been suggested by Birnbaum (2004b) and applied by Birnbaum and Gutierrez (2007) in testing predicted violations of transitivity that are predicted by lexicographic semiorders and reported by Tversky (1969).”
- Testing for intransitivity of preferences predicted by a lexicographic semi-order (2007, methodology): “case. Nor does PH predict the results of branch splitting in the Allais paradoxes ( Birnbaum, 2004a ).”