Influence of mechanical properties of the sheet material on formability in single point incremental forming

By Livan Fratini, G. Ambrogio, R. Lorenzo, L. Filice, F. Micari. 2004

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/075ef645851c326d1b95484769fcfb807fb76cb1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Kathryn Jackson
2. Ricardo José Alves de Sousa
3. Amar Kumar Behera
4. Giuseppe Ingarao
5. Julian M. Allwood
6. Valentin Stefan Oleksik
7. Hengan Ou

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Kathryn Jackson
2. Giuseppe Ingarao
3. Ricardo José Alves de Sousa
4. Amar Kumar Behera
5. Valentin Stefan Oleksik
6. Julian M. Allwood
7. Hengan Ou

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Giuseppe Ingarao
2. Ricardo José Alves de Sousa
3. Amar Kumar Behera
4. Valentin Stefan Oleksik
5. Kathryn Jackson
6. Julian M. Allwood
7. Hengan Ou

Citations in the corpus

• Single point incremental forming: An assessment of the progress and technology trends from 2005 to 2015 (2017, background): “4 63° [60] Brass Truncated cone 12 1 40° [3, 61] Copper Truncated cone 12 1 65° [3, 61] DC01 Truncated cone 10 1 67° [60] DC04 Truncated cone 10 1 64° [43] DDQ Truncated cone 12 1 70° [3, 61] DP600 Varying wall angle conical frustum 16 1 68° [39] DP780 Varying wall angle conical frustum 16 1 45° [39”
• The mechanics of incremental sheet forming (2009, methodology): “Many variations of ISF have been explored, including the use of a water jet, a combination of water and shot, rollers and a vibrating hammering tool, but by far the most widely used tool is a solid hemispherical indenter.”