Models of coping with bereavement: A review.

By Margaret Stroebe, Henk Schut. 2001

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/075e06833009c9790418c4922774fd84b62dfbf5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Wolfgang Stroebe
4. C. Valentine
5. S. J. Marwit
6. L. Matthews
7. R. Neimeyer
8. Henk Aarts

Citations in the corpus

• Examining the Assumptive World Views of Parents Bereaved by Accident, Murder, and Illness (2004, background): “Researchers have defined “coping” as rebuilding the inner world where the formerly unshattered and unchallenged assumptions once resided (M. S. Stroebe & Schut, 2001).”
• Attachment in Coping with Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration (2005, methodology): “The DPM was developed because examination of preexisting models of coping with bereavement revealed a number of shortcomings, some of which are relevant to establishing what precisely effective coping is (for a review, see Stroebe & Schut, 2001b).”
• The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. (2005, unknown): “Consistent with contemporary perspectives on bereavement and attachment theory (Bowlby, 1980; Stroebe & Schut, 2001), the model predicts changes in emotions over time to fluctuate, often widely.”
• Academic constructions of bereavement (2006, background): “The ‘‘dual process’’ model (Stroebe & Schut, 2001) offers a more flexible approach, which allows for gender and cultural differences.”