A performance comparison study of ad hoc wireless multicast protocols
By Sung-Ju Lee, W. Su, Ju-Lan Hsu, Mario Gerla, Rajive L. Bagrodia. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064), 2000
599 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0751590c0c9249d4600af073b29b3a744abaee43
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Mario Gerla
- Sung-Ju Lee
- Carlos Cordeiro
- Lusheng Ji
- Jorjeta G. Jetcheva
- David B. Johnson
- Dharma P. Agrawal
- Mahesh K. Marina
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Carlos Cordeiro
- Mario Gerla
- Jorjeta G. Jetcheva
- David B. Johnson
- Dharma P. Agrawal
- Jean-Pierre Hubaux
- Adrian Perrig
- Srdjan Čapkun
Citations in the corpus
- Multicast over wireless mobile ad hoc networks: present and future directions (2003, background): “A performance study of various multicast routing protocols can be found in [13].”
- Adaptive demand-driven multicast routing in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks (2001, methodology): “We use the On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol (ODMRP) as a point of comparison for ADMR because it has been demonstrated to perform well and is well documented by its designers [19, 20].”
- Differential destination multicast-a MANET multicast routing protocol for small groups (2001, background): “When the group size changes, different protocols react differently.”
- AODV-BR: backup routing in ad hoc networks (2000, methodology): “Because of the richer connectivity of a mesh, these protocols have been shown to perform well compared with tree based single route protocols [4], [11].”