Do interactions between plant roots and the rhizosphere affect parasitoid behaviour?

By E. Guerrieri, G. Lingua, Maria Cristina Digilio, N. Massa, G. Berta. 2004

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07479fda3e2b2df5b9ed9ceec5d1a77ecc966be4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Priming Plant Defence Against Pathogens by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (2009, background): “For example, although several works reported increased performance of sap-feeding insects in mycorrhizal plants (Gange 2006) , colonisation by G. mosseae significantly reduced the performance of potato aphids in tomato ( Guerrieri et al. 2004 ) . The scheme in Fig. 9.1 summarises the general effects”
Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. (2005, background): “The volatile blends released by plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were more attractive to aphid parasitoids than were the blends from plants without mycorrhiza [40].”
Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis on Plant Response to Biotic Stress: The Role of Plant Defence Mechanisms (2010, background): “In addition, AM can also have an impact on herbivores by affecting the performance of their predators and parasitoids: in tomato, the volatile blends released by AM plants can be more attractive to aphid parasitoids than those from non-mycorrhizal ones (Guerrieri et al. 2004).”
Colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi enhanced terpene production in tomato plants and their defense against a herbivorous insect (2015, background): “For instance, tomato plants colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Funnelformis mosseae were more attractive to parasitoids of aphids than non-mycorrhizal plants (Guerrieri et al. 2004).”
Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks: process and functions. A review (2010, background): “Guerrieri et al. (2004) tested the hypothesis that an AM symbiosis makes tomato plants significantly more attractive towards the aphid parasitoid, Aphidius ervi (Haliday), which is well known for its efficiency against the potato aphid pest.”
Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. (2007, background): “Furthermore, the volatile blends released by AM plants can be more attractive to aphid parasitoids than those from non-mycorrhizas [23].”
Plant pathogen-induced volatiles attract parasitoids to increase parasitism of an insect vector (2014, background): “…necessitates investigations beyond two-way interactions and a focus on multiple interactions simultaneously as depicted in Tack and Dicke (2013), Guerrieri et al. (2004) found that the parasitoid, Aphidius ervi Haliday, preferred tomato plants with roots colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal…”
Aphid-plant interactions: a review (2008, background): “In other words, a drastic reduction in the reproductive rate of Macrosiphum euphorbiae and a significant increase of attractiveness towards the parasitoid A. ervi has been recorded on mycorrhizal tomato plants in respect to non mycorrhizal ones (Guerrieri et al. 2004).”
Fruit production and quality of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) are affected by green compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2011, background): “Recent studies have demonstrated that AM fungi can also affect the volatile compounds produced in the leaves (Guerrieri et al. 2004) and increase the concentration of essential oils within basil (Copetta et al. 2006) and oregano leaves (Khaosaad et al. 2006).”