Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice

1,105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Defining and characterizing team resilience in elite sport (2013, methodology): “Regarding the examination of data, although thematic 11 analysis was appropriate for addressing the purposes of this study, this approach precluded 12 the exploration of team member interactions which may have better revealed the discourses 13 within the group context (Liamputtong, 2011). 14 This st”
Resistance and accommodation: factors for the (non-) adoption of machine translation among professional translators (2017, neutral): “However, this paper does not claim to measure the strength of participants’ attitudes, nor to provide generalisable results, as focus groups are not an appropriate method with which to measure phenomena (Barbour, 2007) or to make statistical generalisations (Liamputtong, 2011).”