Stock Identification of Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank Based on Otolith Shape Analysis

By G. Begg, Russell W. Brown. 2000

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0740a10fbe7000f9c7e2bfa250d9c328cbd7e1dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Otolith shape and temporal stability of spawning groups of Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.) (2006, methodology): “…has been used to distinguish among stocks of species such as Atlantic cod (Campana and Casselman, 1993; Cardinale et al., 2004), herring (Clupea harengus; Bird et al., 1986), king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla; DeVries et al., 2002), and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus; Begg and Brown, 2000).”
Otolith shape analysis: its application for discriminating between stocks of Irish Sea and Celtic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) in the Irish Sea (2008, background): “Other studies have linked shape differences to rates of somatic growth ( Begg and Brown, 2000; Simoneau et al., 2000; Cardinale et al., 2004).”
Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis (2007, background): “Several studies have shown that shape analysis thus allowed to discriminate local fish stocks according to ecological factors (Reddin et al. 1988; Smith 1992; Campana and Casselman 1993; Friedland and Reddin 1994; Begg and Brown 2000; Bolles and Begg 2000; Cardinale et al. 2004; Pothin et al. 2006”
Does fish scale morphology allow the identification of populations at a local scale? A case study for rostrum dace Leuciscus leuciscus burdigalensis in River Viaur (SW France) (2005, unknown): “Thus, phenotypic features like body morphology, meristic counts, otolith or scale shape have been widely used in the identification and discrimination of fish populations (Begg and Brown, 2000; Casselman et al., 1981; Meng and Stocker, 1984; Poulet et al, 2004).”
Geographic variation of golden redfish (Sebastes marinus) and deep-sea redfish (S. mentella) in the North Atlantic based on otolith shape analysis (2005, unknown): “In addition to traditional body morphometry, otolith shape analysis has been successfully applied to stock identification of other North Atlantic fish species such as mackerel (Castonguay et al., 1991), cod (Campana and Casselman, 1993; Cardinale et al., 2004), Atlantic salmon (Friedland and Reddin,”
The use of internal otolith morphometrics for identification of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) stocks on Georges Bank (2001, background): “Such confounding variables need to be examined to ensure interpretations of stock differences are real and not simply the result of sample variation (Castonguay et al., 1991; Begg and Brown, 2000).”
Genetic and morphometric variations in the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) of a fragmented delta (2004, methodology): “We used morphometric and meristic characters (Meng & Stocker 1984, Hurlbut & Clay 1998, Cadrin 2000), otolith shape (Bird et al. 1986, Campana & Casselman 1993, Friedland & Reddin 1994, Begg & Brown 2000) and protein electrophoresis (Allendorf & Phelps 1981, Berrebi et al. 2000).”
Feeding history influences otolith shape in tropical fish (2004, background): “The utility of otolith shape analysis extends beyond these differentiations, as it provides insights into events that influence otolith growth (Bird et al. 1986, Smith 1992, Campana & Casselman 1993, Begg & Brown 2000).”