Periodicities in cluster algebras and dilogarithm identities
By Tomoki Nakanishi. 2010
70 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We consider two kinds of periodicities of mutations in cluster algebras. For any sequence of mutations under which exchange matrices are periodic, we define the associated T- and Y-systems. When the sequence is `regular', they are particularly natural generalizations of the known `classic' T- and Y-systems. Furthermore, for any sequence of mutations under which seeds are periodic, we formulate the associated dilogarithm identity. We prove the identities when exchange matrices are skew symmetric.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07348f11a1e685f8de77bed046da4649f54ea12d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
- K. Nagao
- B. Keller
- I. Reiten
- Pierre-Guy Plamondon
- Bernard Leclerc
- Osamu Iyama
- Alexander Kuznetsov
- Ralf Schiffler
In Artificial Intelligence
In Geometry and Topology
- B. Keller
- K. Nagao
- Pierre-Guy Plamondon
- I. Reiten
- Osamu Iyama
- Bernard Leclerc
- Fan Qin
- Alexander Kuznetsov
Citations in the corpus
- Introduction to Cluster Algebras (2018, unknown): “We also refer the reader to [41, 22], where periodicities of cluster algebra mutations are used to derive dilogarithm identities.”
- Cluster algebras and derived categories (2012, methodology): “We refer to [112] [77] for more information on the many recent developments around this subject and to [143] for more information on the dilogarithm function.”
- Donaldson-Thomas theory and cluster algebras (2010, background): “ k,i◦ = −tg i,k i= k0, tg i,k +Q(i,k0) ·tgk 0,k i6= k0, ε(0) = −, tg i,k +Q(k0,i)·tgk 0,k i6= k0, ε(0) = +. Proof. This is a consequence of (2.3) and Corollary 8.6. 9The duality has proved in [Nakb] for skewsymmetric matrices. For skewsymmetrizable matrices, it is still a conjecture. 36 8.4 g-vec”