Threshold Saturation via Spatial Coupling: Why Convolutional LDPC Ensembles Perform So Well over the BEC

By Shrinivas Kudekar, T. Richardson, Rüdiger L. Urbanke. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010

688 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Convolutional low-density parity-check (LDPC) ensembles, introduced by Felström and Zigangirov, have excellent thresholds and these thresholds are rapidly increasing functions of the average degree. Several variations on the basic theme have been proposed to date, all of which share the good performance characteristics of convolutional LDPC ensembles. We describe the fundamental mechanism that explains why “convolutional-like” or “spatially coupled” codes perform so well. In essence, the spatial coupling of individual codes increases the belief-propagation (BP) threshold of the new ensemble to its maximum possible value, namely the maximum a posteriori (MAP) threshold of the underlying ensemble. For this reason, we call this phenomenon “threshold saturation.” This gives an entirely new way of approaching capacity. One significant advantage of this construction is that one can create capacity-approaching ensembles with an error correcting radius that is increasing in the blocklength. Although we prove the “threshold saturation” only for a specific ensemble and for the binary erasure channel (BEC), empirically the phenomenon occurs for a wide class of ensembles and channels. More generally, we conjecture that for a large range of graphical systems a similar saturation of the “dynamical” threshold occurs once individual components are coupled sufficiently strongly. This might give rise to improved algorithms and new techniques for analysis.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0726f99e4d3a669f19b9245a68b10a0a546b4027

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Gianluigi Liva
  2. Lenka Zdeborov'a
  3. Florent Krzakala
  4. Marco Chiani
  5. Rüdiger L. Urbanke
  6. Enrico Paolini
  7. T. Richardson
  8. M. M'ezard

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Gianluigi Liva
  2. Marco Chiani
  3. Enrico Paolini
  4. Lenka Zdeborov'a
  5. Florent Krzakala
  6. Rüdiger L. Urbanke
  7. T. Richardson
  8. M. M'ezard

Citations in the corpus