Distinction between Mulloidichthys flavolineatus juveniles from Reunion Island and Mauritius Island (south‐west Indian Ocean) based on otolith morphometrics

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Otolith shape in juvenile cod (Gadus morhua): Ontogenetic and environmental effects (2008, background): “…rates between groups, this response may to some degree also be the reason for differences between geographical areas (Castonguay et al., 1991; Pothin et al., 2006; Smith, 1992; Tracey et al., 2006) and year-classes (Bolles and Begg, 2000; Campana and Casselman, 1993; Castonguay et al., 1991).”
Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis (2007, background): “Since the discovery of daily growth increments (Pannella 1971), otoliths are increasingly considered as very useful tools to study the various events that characterize fish life cycles (Campana 1999; Lecomte-Finiger 1999; Newman and Dunk 2002; Pothin et al. 2004, 2006 ).”
Otolith shape analysis: its application for discriminating between stocks of Irish Sea and Celtic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) in the Irish Sea (2008, background): “Other studies have shown substantial differences between groups with little or no geographic separation (Galley et al., 2006; Pothin et al., 2006), or which have failed to be distinguished genetically (DeVries et al.”