Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis

589 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Valuing Environmental Factors in Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis (2006, unknown): “The key differences to that paper is that we here assess efficiency of projects in terms of the discounted NPV of economic benefits over the entire use life, whereas Kortelainen and Kuosmanen (2005) measure eco-efficiency of consumer durables in terms of economic cost per single use or performance.”
Eco-Efficiency and Convergence in OECD Countries (2013, methodology): “Next, we borrow the definition of eco-efficiency from Kuosmanen and Kortelainen (2005) as the ratio between an indicator of economic performance, measured in our case by GDP, and an aggregate environmental pressure composite indicator.”
Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research (2019, background): “The evaluation scale covers towns [77], farms and farmers [28,64,78].”
An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance (2020, background): “For instance, policies targeting improvement in relative performance may be easier to implement and less costly to achieve than policies restricting the level of economic activity (Kuosmanen and Kortelainen, 2005; Mullins, 2018).”
A Framework for Quantified Eco‐efficiency Analysis (2005, background): “This may be seen as a special case of the more general efficiency frontier approach ( Kuosmanen and Kortelainen 2005 ).”