The pitfalls of pitfalls: a comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrate predators in Arable Land
By A. Lang. Anzeiger Fur Schadlingskunde-journal of Pest Science, 2000
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0701ae7d9c87b36a7ea843163bc7f9c68399a5a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- E. Brockerhoff
- Steven Pawson
- Esther D. Meenken
- Mário Almeida-Neto
- R. Pinto‐da‐Rocha
- A. Giaretta
- Raphael K. Didham
- G. Machado
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Non-native plantation forests as alternative habitat for native forest beetles in a heavily modified landscape (2008, background): “As with all passive trapping systems, such as malaise or flight interception trapping, capture rates in pitfall traps represent an integrated measure of local density and wider-scale activity rates, and cannot necessarily be used as a direct measure of local population density (Southwood 1994; Lang”
- Harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) species distribution along three Neotropical elevational gradients: an alternative rescue effect to explain Rapoport's rule? (2006, background): “Thus we seek to avoid bias due to differences in mobility and vagility between species, which is known to occur in passive methods such as pitfall traps (Adis, 1979; Lang, 2000).”