Natural Resources and the ‘Quality’ of Economic Development

By V. Daniele. 2011

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Development, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06ec89ffc9555d7981ca4d05229f565e5b7edee5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. E. Papyrakis
2. L. Cockx
3. Nathalie Francken
4. E. Gilberthorpe
5. Atsushi Iimi

In Development

1. E. Papyrakis
2. L. Cockx
3. E. Gilberthorpe
4. Nathalie Francken

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Papyrakis
2. E. Gilberthorpe
3. L. Cockx
4. Nathalie Francken
5. Shuai Shao
6. Lili Yang
7. J. Weber
8. A. James

Citations in the corpus

• The Resource Curse - What Have We Learned from Two Decades of Intensive Research: Introduction to the Special Issue (2017, background): “Additionally, new analysis moved beyond growth impacts and instead explored negative links between mineral abundance and broader human development indices and sustainability indicators (for example, Atkinson & Hamilton, 2003; Bulte et al., 2005; Daniele, 2011; Dietz, Neumayer, & de Soysa, 2007).”
• The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “…(2007) finds that oil dependence correlates with gender inequality (in the domain of labour force participation and political representation), while Daniele (2011) and de Soysa and Gizelis (2013) claim that mineral rich countries underperform in health indicators (e.g. proxied by child mortality…”
• Extending the concept of the resource curse: natural resources and public spending on health (2014, background): “Daniele (2011) finds that human development indicators, measured by the human development index, are negatively influenced by dependence, but positively by abundance.”