Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique

By F. Hartwig, N. Davies, Gibran Hemani, George Davey Smith. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2016

737 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique Fernando Pires Hartwig*, Neil Martin Davies, Gibran Hemani and George Davey Smith Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil, Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol and School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Subfields: Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06e3334fbc7e1837381b5e93330d90bcc6742193

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. J. Bowden
  2. George Davey Smith
  3. Gibran Hemani
  4. Stephen Burgess
  5. F. Hartwig
  6. Philip C. Haycock
  7. E. Sanderson
  8. S. Thompson

Citations in the corpus