Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation

By Rafael Polanía, Michael A. Nitsche, Christian C. Ruff. Nature Neuroscience, 2018

877 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06e2cae73703321fd6edabd4240e7e12d27565b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Justin Riddle
2. Mattia F. Pagnotta
3. Jason M. Scimeca
4. Daniel Sheltraw
5. B. Inglis
6. Chris Muse-Fisher
7. Mark D'Esposito
8. M. D'esposito

In Neurology

1. Justin Riddle
2. Mattia F. Pagnotta
3. Mark D'Esposito

Citations in the corpus

• A guide for concurrent TMS-fMRI to investigate functional brain networks (2022, background): “Whereas behavioral studies that use TMS can provide valuable causal evidence about the consequences of stimulation on cognition (PascualLeone et al., 1992; Pitcher et al., 2007; Polanía et al., 2018; Riddle et al., 2019, 2020a; Bergmann and Hartwigsen, 2021), they cannot characterize the effect of s”
• Haemodynamic correlates of bilateral 6 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation during working memory enhancement revealed by fNIRS (2026, unknown): “Major NIBS approaches include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) (Polanía et al., 2018).”