CATHEDRAL: A Fast and Effective Algorithm to Predict Folds and Domain Boundaries from Multidomain Protein Structures
By Oliver Redfern, Andrew P. Harrison, Timothy Dallman, Frances M. G. Pearl, Christine A. Orengo. 2007
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present CATHEDRAL, an iterative protocol for determining the location of previously observed protein folds in novel multidomain protein structures. CATHEDRAL builds on the features of a fast secondary-structure–based method (using graph theory) to locate known folds within a multidomain context and a residue-based, double-dynamic programming algorithm, which is used to align members of the target fold groups against the query protein structure to identify the closest relative and assign domain boundaries. To increase the fidelity of the assignments, a support vector machine is used to provide an optimal scoring scheme. Once a domain is verified, it is excised, and the search protocol is repeated in an iterative fashion until all recognisable domains have been identified. We have performed an initial benchmark of CATHEDRAL against other publicly available structure comparison methods using a consensus dataset of domains derived from the CATH and SCOP domain classifications. CATHEDRAL shows superior performance in fold recognition and alignment accuracy when compared with many equivalent methods. If a novel multidomain structure contains a known fold, CATHEDRAL will locate it in 90% of cases, with <1% false positives. For nearly 80% of assigned domains in a manually validated test set, the boundaries were correctly delineated within a tolerance of ten residues. For the remaining cases, previously classified domains were very remotely related to the query chain so that embellishments to the core of the fold caused significant differences in domain sizes and manual refinement of the boundaries was necessary. To put this performance in context, a well-established sequence method based on hidden Markov models was only able to detect 65% of domains, with 33% of the subsequent boundaries assigned within ten residues. Since, on average, 50% of newly determined protein structures contain more than one domain unit, and typically 90% or more of these domains are already classified in CATH, CATHEDRAL will considerably facilitate the automation of protein structure classification.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- Lukasz Kurgan
- Yang Zhang
- Ke Chen
- Jinfeng Liu
- Burkhard Rost
- Wojciech Stach
- Gaetano T. Montelione
- Leila Homaeian
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- RUPEE: A fast and accurate purely geometric protein structure search (2018, neutral): “{ [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 7] [5, 7, 5], [7, 5, 11], [5, 11, 11], [11, 11, 5], [11, 5, 5] [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 5], [5, 5, 5] } (2)”
- Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage (2009, background): “This has to be done because most structures in the PDB contain single domains while over 75% of proteins in nature appear to contain multiple domains [19–21, 34].”
- Gene3D: a domain-based resource for comparative genomics, functional annotation and protein network analysis (2011, methodology): “Similarities are calculated using CATHEDRAL (19) and clustered with a threshold of 5 Å normalized root mean square deviation (RMSD).”
- Extending CATH: increasing coverage of the protein structure universe and linking structure with function (2010, methodology): “All the usability of the original site is being maintained, including the CATHEDRAL (16) and SSAP (17,18) web servers for structural comparison.”
- iFC2: an integrated web-server for improved prediction of protein structural class, fold type, and secondary structure content (2010, background): “The knowledge of these descriptors was applied in a vast number of areas including reduction of the search space of possible conformations of the tertiary structures (Bahar et al. 1997), identification of domain boundaries in multidomain protein structures ( Redfern et al. 2007 ), analysis of intera”