Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling

By Nicolò Spagnolo, C. Vitelli, M. Bentivegna, D. Brod, Andrea Crespi, Fulvio Flamini, Sandro Giacomini, G. Milani, Roberta Ramponi, Paolo Mataloni and 3 more. Nature Photonics, 2013

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

To address the controversy regarding the validation of an experiment that is hard to simulate, boson-sampling experiments are implemented with three photons in randomly designed integrated chips with up to 13 modes. It is experimentally demonstrated that the Aaronson–Arkhipov test allows boson-sampling experiments to be distinguished from uniformly drawn samples. A boson sampling device is a specialized quantum computer that solves a problem that is strongly believed to be computationally hard for classical computers1. Recently, a number of small-scale implementations have been reported2,3,4,5, all based on multiphoton interference in multimode interferometers. Akin to several quantum simulation and computation tasks, an open problem in the hard-to-simulate regime is to what extent the correctness of the boson sampling outcomes can be certified6,7. Here, we report new boson sampling experiments on larger photonic chips and analyse the data using a recently proposed scalable statistical test8. We show that the test successfully validates small experimental data samples against the hypothesis that they are uniformly distributed. In addition, we show how to discriminate data arising from either indistinguishable or distinguishable photons. Our results pave the way towards larger boson sampling experiments whose functioning, despite being non-trivial to simulate, can be certified against alternative hypotheses.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06d127af82ec7eac94e5666af1beb32749206b12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Nathan Killoran
  2. Josh A. Izaac
  3. Ville Bergholm
  4. Maria Schuld
  5. Nicolás Quesada
  6. Christian Weedbrook
  7. Aram Wettroth Harrow
  8. Michael Hochberg

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Michael Hochberg
  2. M. Pant
  3. T. Baehr‐Jones
  4. Lixing You
  5. Dirk Englund
  6. Nicholas Christopher Harris

Citations in the corpus