Shock Therapy Versus Gradualism: The End Of The Debate (Explaining The Magnitude Of Transformational Recession)

By V. Popov. 2000

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Political Economy of Transition (2001, background): “Economists have tended to limit their examination of initial conditions to initial economic conditions (for example, Åslund et al., 1996; Popov, 2000; Havrylyshyn et al., 1998; Berg et al., 1999; Krueger and Ciolko, 1998; Heybey and Murrell, 1999).”
Drivers of CO2 emissions in the former Soviet Union: A country level IPAT analysis from 1990 to 2010 (2013, background): “processes, with Uzbekistan being the worst procrastinator [3].”
Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't and What We Should (2002, unknown): “Such endogeneity problems are discussed in the political economy literature (Roland 2000; Castanheira and Popov 2000).”
Shock Therapy versus Gradualism Reconsidered: Lessons from Transition Economies after 15 Years of Reforms (2007, unknown): “…was falling for about a decade and fell in some cases to virtually zero, whereas the growth of output in competitive industries was constrained, among other factors, by the limited investment potential a d was not enough to compensate for the output loss in the inefficient sectors (Popov, 2000).”