Social dominance‐based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance

By Kimberly Costello, Gordon Hodson. 2011

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06ce97288f2aecb4dd1123eb01b99c63793fd171

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? (2014, background): “…2006; Stephan & Renfro, 2002), particularly among those who are most inclined to follow/defend mainstream social norms and dominant ideological systems; those higher in RWA or SDO (e.g., Asbrock, Sibley, & Duckitt, 2010; Costello & Hodson, 2011; Hodson, Hogg, & MacInnis, 2009; McFarland, 2005).”
Refugee integration: Research and policy. (2018, unknown): “More threat is also perceived among those who identify more strongly with their ingroup (Tajfel & Turner, 2001) and care more about relative social status (e.g., Social Dominance Orientation, Costello & Hodson, 2011; Dunwoody & McFarland, 2017; Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994; Uenal, 201”
Social Dominance Theory: Explorations in the Psychology of Oppression (2016, unknown): “Costello & Hodson, 2011 Esses, Veenvliet, Hodson, & Mihic, 2008 Kteily et al., in press”
An experimental approach to Intergroup Threat Theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat (2018, background): “…the perceived competitiveness of and hence realistic threat posed by specific subgroups rather than the entire outgroup (Cohrs & Asbrock, 2009), as well as to increase realistic threat from a fictitious outgroup (Stephan, Renfro, Esses, Stephan, & Martin, 2005; see also Costello & Hodson, 2011).”
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “Finally, contextual factors also play a role, as when the association between individual differences (e.g., SDO, or ITG-DS) and prejudice varies as a function of manipulated threat, emotions, or contact (e.g., Choma et al., 2012; Costello & Hodson, 2011; Hodson, Dube et al., 2015).”
It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target (2017, background): “Thus, if not for being more threatened by vegetarianism/veganism, those higher in RWA or conservatism would not express more negative attitudes toward vegetarians or vegans, and those higher in SDO would not express as negative attitudes toward vegetarians or vegans.”
Intergroup Anxiety (2014, background): “Other studies indicate that intergroup anxiety is negatively correlated with favorable behavioral intentions concerning outgroup contact (Martínez, 2000) and willingness to provide direct assistance to immigrants (Costello & Hodson, 2011).”