Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.

By P. Lum, C. Burgar, P. Shor, Matra Majmundar, Machiel Van der Loos. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2002

1,203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06b814cd021e324e073ef392cdc757358720864b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Steven C. Cramer
2. Robert Riener

In Neurology

1. L. Der-Yeghiaian
2. Vu Le
3. Craig D. Takahashi
4. Steven C. Cramer
5. Rehan R Motiwala

In Rehabilitation

1. L. Der-Yeghiaian
2. Vu Le
3. Craig D. Takahashi
4. Steven C. Cramer
5. Robert Riener
6. Rehan R Motiwala

Citations in the corpus

• A Framework to Describe, Analyze and Generate Interactive Motor Behaviors (2012, neutral): “Even if the ‘‘passive mode’’ used in first stage, where the arm is moved by the robot, is similar to an assistance scheme, the ‘‘active mode’’ in which robot is only correcting patient movements ‘‘just-as-needed’’ is similar to an education scheme [41,42,63,64].”
• Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review (2008, background): “The robot enables the bilateral practice of a 3-DoF shoulder-elbow movement, whereby the nonparetic arm guides the paretic arm.(12) The InMotion(2) Shoulder-Elbow Robot, which is the commercial version of MIT-MANUS, has 2 DoF and provides shoulderelbow training in the horizontal plane with a support”
• A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation (2014, background): “MIME, Burgar [120] 6 Shoulder * elbow Forearm position, orientation, torque DC brushed servomotors (PUMA 560 robot) Stationary system (end-effector-based); physical therapy CII studies: 27(13) cS [48] and 30(24) sS [49], CI study: 13 cS [50]; see also ARC-MIME”
• Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery (2016, neutral): “…experience pain of the upper extremity during the first year after stroke, especially shoulder pain and complex regional pain syndrome-type I (CRPS-type I), which may impede adequate early rehabilitation (Jönsson et al., 2006; Kocabas et al., 2007; Sackley et al., 2008; Lundström et al., 2009).”
• Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. (2007, background): “…1999; Krebs et al., 2002; Lum et al., 2002; Fasoli et al., 2003; Ferraro et al., 2003; Kahn et al., 2006b), with few exceptions (Jack et al., 2001; Hesse et al., 2003b), these efforts have been primarily focused on the proximal arm (Krebs et al., 1999; Reinkensmeyer et al., 2000; Lum et al., 2002).”
• ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy (2007, background): “There is further evidence that machine-delivered therapies can enhance the treatment [1, 5, 20, 21, 32].”