The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon?

By Romain Weikmans, J. Roberts. 2019

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The sources and governance of climate finance have been widely debated since the 2009 climate change summit in Copenhagen, when rich countries promised to provide US$ 30 billion in additional climate finance by 2012 and to mobilize US$ 100 billion a year by 2020 to address the mitigation and adaptation needs of developing countries. Have developed countries respected their financial commitments? Which countries have been the main beneficiaries of international climate money? As simple as these questions may seem, answers to them have proved to be highly controversial and have contributed to a continuous erosion of trust between Parties in international climate negotiations. This article explores the controversies around international climate finance figures. It examines how the lack of internationally agreed modalities to account for climate finance has given rise to a plethora of accounting and reporting practices that leads to widely contrasting statements on climate finance. We show that, despite some gaps, the Paris Agreement’s “enhanced transparency framework” could lead to marked improvements in the way climate finance is accounted and reported.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06ae8dd77e6d4baacaf438d171a31a1399f4f9a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. W. Pauw
  2. Jonathan Pickering
  3. P. Castro
  4. S. Bhasin

Citations in the corpus