The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration
329 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Energy, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06ab2c21e15c34f0c8d89cad5c163da3e43a4ded
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Energy
In Pollution
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- David McCollum
- Keywan Riahi
- Nico Bauer
- Peter D. Lund
- K. Narula
- B. Reddy
- Volker Krey
- Diogenis Baboukardos
Citations in the corpus
- Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds (2014, background): “Energy security concerns can be categorized along three dimensions: sovereignty, resilience, and robustness (Cherp et al. 2012; Cherp and Jewell 2011).”
- Three blind men and an elephant: The case of energy indices to measure energy security and energy sustainability (2015, background): “Literature [11–16], on the concept of energy security shows that although energy security is an allencompassing term, which includes economic competitiveness of energy [17], environmental”
- Energy system resilience – A review (2021, background): “Cherp and Jewell [39] have tried to simplify the discussion by integrating robustness, sovereignty, and resilience perspectives into”
- The IEA Model of Short-Term Energy Security (MOSES): Primary Energy Sources and Secondary Fuels (2011, neutral): “Recent literature on energy security focuses on defining energy security and delineating its dimensions (Sovacool and Brown, 2010; Cherp and Jewell, 2011; Jansen and Seebregts 2009; Stirling 2010), and on metrics, indicators and quantification methodologies (APERC, 2007; Gupta, ”