Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses

By Manfredo Atzori, A. Gijsberts, Claudio Castellini, Barbara Caputo, A. M. Hager, Simone Elsig, G. Giatsidis, F. Bassetto, Henning Müller. Scientific Data, 2014

915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent advances in rehabilitation robotics suggest that it may be possible for hand-amputated subjects to recover at least a significant part of the lost hand functionality. The control of robotic prosthetic hands using non-invasive techniques is still a challenge in real life: myoelectric prostheses give limited control capabilities, the control is often unnatural and must be learned through long training times. Meanwhile, scientific literature results are promising but they are still far from fulfilling real-life needs. This work aims to close this gap by allowing worldwide research groups to develop and test movement recognition and force control algorithms on a benchmark scientific database. The database is targeted at studying the relationship between surface electromyography, hand kinematics and hand forces, with the final goal of developing non-invasive, naturally controlled, robotic hand prostheses. The validation section verifies that the data are similar to data acquired in real-life conditions, and that recognition of different hand tasks by applying state-of-the-art signal features and machine-learning algorithms is possible. Design Type(s) in vivo design • injury design • observation design • parallel group design Measurement Type(s) muscular activity Technology Type(s) electromyography Factor Type(s) Injury Sample Characteristic(s) Homo sapiens • adult organism Design Type(s) in vivo design • injury design • observation design • parallel group design Measurement Type(s) muscular activity Technology Type(s) electromyography Factor Type(s) Injury Sample Characteristic(s) Homo sapiens • adult organism Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data (ISA-Tab format)

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0686645a028567f6221ea6bfd54ae96a8f56145c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Rosa H. M. Chan
  2. Xiaolong Zhai
  3. Chung Tin
  4. Beth Jelfs
  5. Rami N. Khushaba
  6. Erik J. Scheme
  7. Monica Reggiani
  8. Angkoon Phinyomark

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. Rosa H. M. Chan
  2. Xiaolong Zhai
  3. Chung Tin
  4. Beth Jelfs
  5. Angkoon Phinyomark
  6. Manfredo Atzori
  7. Erik J. Scheme
  8. Henning Müller

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Rami N. Khushaba
  2. Erik J. Scheme
  3. Rosa H. M. Chan
  4. Xiaolong Zhai
  5. Chung Tin
  6. Beth Jelfs
  7. Monica Reggiani
  8. Angkoon Phinyomark

Citations in the corpus