Microsatellites in plants: a new class of molecular markers
By Pankaj Kumar Gupta, H. Balyan, P. Sharma. 2002
422 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/067637fa50ef982e91c248c9a1185d3066f7620d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Samina N. Qureshi
- S. Saha
- R. Kantety
- Zeng‐Yu Wang
- M. Sorrells
- Johnie N. Jenkins Jr.
- R. Sánchez-Pérez
- V. M. Novelli
Citations in the corpus
- The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat (2000, background): “Frequency, distribution and organization of microsatellites within genomes Microsatellites are abundant and occur frequently and randomly in all eukaryotic nuclear DNAs examined (Tautz & Renz, 1984; Gupta et al., 1996).”
- Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) (2006, background): “Genetic studies using microsatellite markers have increased rapidly because they are highly polymorphic, heterozygous conserved sequences which can be used as codominant markers (Gupta et al., 1996; Zane et al., 2002).”
- Application of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in apricot breeding: molecular characterization, protection, and genetic relationships (2005, background): “Bands present in the descendants were always present in at least one of the parental genotypes, corroborating then the co-dominant nature of these markers (Gupta et al., 1996).”
- Mapping major genes and quantitative trait loci controlling agronomic traits in almond (2007, background): “Recently, simple-sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites have become good molecular markers for genetic studies in plants because of their high polymorphism, abundance, simplicity of use and codominant expression (Gupta et al. 1996).”
- Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat (2002, background): “Often referred to as simple sequence repeats (SSRs), they can be found in both coding and non-coding DNA sequences of all higher organisms examined to date (Tautz and Renz, 1984; Gupta et al. , 1996).”
- Sourcing of SSR markers from related plant species. (2001, background): “increase in elaborate population studies (Gupta et al., 1996; Jarne and Lagoda, 1996; Powell et al., 1996a; Goldstein and Pollock, 1997; Rossetto et al., 1999).”
- Inheritance of Flowering Time in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) and Analysis of Linked Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers (2011, unknown): “2008) because of their high polymorphism, abundance, and co-dominant inheritance (Gupta et al. 1996; Hormaza 2002; Messina et al. 2004; Sánchez-Pérez et al. 2005; Zhebentyayeva et al. 2003).”
- Identification of Microsatellite Markers for Plasmopara viticola and Establishment of High throughput Method for SSR Analysis (2003, background): “…into three classes: (1) perfect repeats, where each repeat follows the next without interruptions, (2) imperfect repeats, where repeats are interrupted by non-repeat bases, and (3) compound repeats, where two or more repeat units are adjacent to each other (Gupta et al., 1996; Weber and May, 1989).”
- Forage and Turf Grass Biotechnology (2001, background): “SSRs are one to five base repeat motifs that can be found in both coding and noncoding DNA sequences of most higher organisms (Gupta et al., 1996).”
- Methods for Development of Microsatellite Markers: An Overview (2014, unknown): “Microsatellites are stretches of DNA consisting of tandemly arranged units of 1-6 bp (Gupta et al., 1996; Thiel et al., 2003), characterised by their co-dominant inheritance, wide genomic distribution, hyper variable and multiallelic nature (Powell et al.”
- MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY EST-SSR: A New Class of Genetic Markers in Cotton (2004, background): “Gupta et al. (1996) reported the most abundant tri-nucleotide repeat motifs in plants were (AAG)n and (AAT)n with some species-specific variations.”