Throwing the mountains into the lakes: on the perils of nomothetic conceptions of the exercise-affect relationship.
By L. Landuyt, P. Ekkekakis, E. Hall, S. Petruzzello. 2000
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/066bd00e9e12c18867b74fed8749be1e6c0ce914
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- Acute Affective Response to a Moderate-intensity Exercise Stimulus Predicts Physical Activity Participation 6 and 12 Months Later. (2008, background): “…more positive affective response to exercise and greater exercise adherence, as well as present and previous findings (Ekkekakis et al., 2000; Van Landuyt et al., 2000) showing a variable affective response to moderate-intensity exercise (as defined by percent of maximal heart rate), one would…”
- The Pleasure and Displeasure People Feel When they Exercise at Different Intensities (2011, background): “However, variability, even to the same exercise intensity and for individuals of the same sex, age, health and physical fitness, is often pronounced.([43,44]) Evidence also shows that the degree of variability changes as a function of exercise intensity.”
- Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: IV. A conceptual case for the affect circumplex (2002, background): “…moderate-intensity walking (Ekkekakis, Hall, Van Land- uyt, & Petruzzello, 2000), moderate-intensity running, aerobics (Ekkekakis et al., 1999), cycling (Van Landuyt et al., 2000), and maximal exercise (Hall, Ekkekakis, & Petruzzello, 2001), to exhaustive exercise (Ekkekakis et al. 1997, 1998).”
- Some like It Vigorous: Measuring Individual Differences in the Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity (2005, background): “…is evidence of systematic interindividual differences in the intensity of exercise that individuals choose (Farrell et al., 1982; Spelman et al., 1993) and the intensity they can tolerate without a decline in affective valence when that intensity is externally imposed (Van Landuyt et al., 2000).”