Differences in foraging behaviour between Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) and Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825)

By Ian Davidson-Watts, Gareth J. F. Jones. 2005

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/066249a8932bfec9c78cbab81de990e5f847b771

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. A. Hirzel
2. R. Arlettaz
3. Thomas Sattler
4. F. Bontadina
5. Antoine Guisan
6. G. L. Lay
7. Miguel B. Araújo
8. Jorge M. Lobo

In Ecology

1. A. Hirzel
2. R. Arlettaz
3. Thomas Sattler
4. F. Bontadina
5. G. L. Lay
6. Gareth J. F. Jones
7. Jorge M. Lobo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Hirzel
2. R. Arlettaz
3. Thomas Sattler
4. F. Bontadina
5. Antoine Guisan
6. Miguel B. Araújo
7. Wilfried Thuiller

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological niche modelling of two cryptic bat species calls for a reassessment of their conservation status (2007, methodology): “…and Italy: P. pygmaeus is frequently found near water bodies in all areas studied to date; in Ireland and Italy, open deciduous forests constitute other suitable habitats (Vaughan, Jones & Harris 1997; Häussler et al. 2000; Russ & Montgomery 2002; Russo & Jones 2003; Davidson-Watts & Jones 2006).”
• Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: The National Bat Monitoring Programme in Great Britain (2015, unknown): “pipistrellus (Barlow and Jones, 1999; Davidson-Watts and Jones, 2005).”