Reduction of the singularities of codimension one singular foliations in dimension three
By F. Cano. 2004
80 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/065a8537ed32d104acfdb9bd3760f7be95894083
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Geometry and Topology
- Vincent Cossart
- Steven Dale Cutkosky
- Olivier Piltant
- D. Panazzolo
- M. Temkin
- Christopher D. Hacon
- Franz-Viktor Kuhlmann
- Shreeram S. Abhyankar
Citations in the corpus
- Resolution of singularities of arithmetical threefolds (2014, background): “Differential multiplicities and permissible centers have a similar behavior to adapted multiplicities and permissible blowing ups considered in Resolution of Singularities for differential forms and vector fields [76][15][16][17][64][70] and for toroidalization of morphisms [37][34].”
- Resolution of singularities for 3-folds in positive characteristic (2006, background): “7 of [Ab8] comes in), and after enough blow ups, there must actually be a drop in ct. The problem with order going up under resolution also occurs in resolution of vector fields (Seidenberg [Se], Cano [Ca] and Panazzolo [Pa]) and in monomialization of morphisms (Cutkosky [C1], [C3]; and Cutkosky and ”
- Resolution of singularities of real-analytic vector fields in dimension three (2006, methodology): “Based on these facts, the global strategy of resolution is similar to the one presented by Cano in [ C2 ], based on the notion of generic equireducibility and bad points.”